歷年考研英語(yǔ)(二)真題較少，但是不可掉以輕心，一定要合理利用。為了幫助大家更好地復(fù)習(xí)，小編為各位同學(xué)梳理一下歷年考研英語(yǔ)(二)真題閱讀文章中涉及的要點(diǎn)，包括詞匯、短語(yǔ)、長(zhǎng)難句以及簡(jiǎn)單的閱讀方法。接下來(lái)看一下2010年考研英語(yǔ)(二)真題閱讀Text 4，這篇文章主要探討了美國(guó)陪審團(tuán)制度的歷史和發(fā)展。

　　The system also failed to regularly include women ... Although ... it was not until the 1940s that a majority of states made women eligible for jury duty... exempted women from jury duty unless they personally asked to have ... This practice was justified by the claim that women were needed at home, and it kept juries unrepresentative of women through the 1960s.

　　fail to do“沒(méi)能做某事”;although“盡管”，引導(dǎo)讓步狀語(yǔ)從句，我們要重點(diǎn)關(guān)注主句部分;a majority of“大多數(shù)”;eligible“合格的，有資格當(dāng)選的”;exempt from“免除”;unless“除非”，引導(dǎo)條件狀語(yǔ)從句;personally“親自地”;ask to do“請(qǐng)求做某事”;justify“證明...合理”;claim“聲稱”;be unrepresentative of“不代表”。

　　In 1968, the Congress of the United States passed the Jury Selection and Service Act, ushering in a new era of democratic reforms for the jury. This law abolished special educational requirements for federal jurors and required them to be selected at random from a cross section of the entire community. In the landmark 1975 decision Taylor v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court extended the requirement that juries be representative of all parts of the community to the state level. The Taylor decision also declared sex discrimination in jury selection to be unconstitutional and ordered states to use the same procedures for selecting male and female jurors.

　　congress“國(guó)會(huì)”;pass“通過(guò)”;act“法案”，相當(dāng)于bill;usher in“引進(jìn)”;era“時(shí)代，紀(jì)元”;reform“改革”，也可以充當(dāng)動(dòng)詞;abolish“廢除，取消”;special educational requirement“特殊教育需求”;federal“聯(lián)邦的”;require sb. to do“要求某人做某事”;entire“整個(gè)的，全體的”;landmark“有重大意義或影響的”，也可以表示“里程碑，劃時(shí)代的事”;decision“決議”;the Supreme Court“最高法院”;extend to“延伸，擴(kuò)展”;be representative of“代表”;state level“州政府層面”;declare“宣稱”;sex discrimination“性別歧視”;unconstitutional“違反憲法的”;order“命令”;male“男性的”，female“女性的”。